Chad says:
I see you put a comment from David Gleim about the comment from Dan Preston on your blog. I would like to have it clarified that this was directly from Andrew Thompson today at a meeting in Moose Jaw.
Also:
In response to David’s comment about the $1.2 & 1.8 Million, it’s because they are trying to make it look worse to the public. They hired a communications person in January (Prairie South did) specifically for spinning things to sound good. The $1.8 million 'loss' is actually from 2006-07 to 2007-08 fiscal years. This decrease has nothing at all to do with the budget. The per pupil grant has to do with the PRE budget 2006-07 compared to the POST budget 2006-07.
The per pupil grant INCREASE was from Andrew Thompsons lips himself today. I don't care what the boards try to say to the public, I don't believe a word they say any more, especially after what they said to me yesterday, and the proven lies they have said to the public. (See my media release re: amortizing buses)
Thank you very much.
Chad
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Posted for Dawn:
To Balance not Bias.
You do not go the the funding manual for the grants received for last year.....you go the the school board office and get a copy of the 2005-06 audited financial statement...Like I did. In this will be a whole lot more information such as all the RM's who get grants in Lieu of taxes and more goodies. You might find it interesting reading. Try it.
Dawn Reich
Post a Comment